Rocky Mountain Football League

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 5 Playoff standings


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 175
Date:
Week 5 Playoff standings
Permalink  
 


*I will be looking back through the league meeting notes to make sure this is correct tomorrow when I get to the office.  There is a tiebreaker that I am 99% sure that I have right but want to double check*

AAA:

Upper Tier:

1.  Dixie Rebels

2.  Brigham Sting

3.  Montana Blaze

4.  Idaho Matadors

5.  Wasatch REVolution

6.  Logan Stampede (Better SOS of 3-2 teams)

 

Second Tier:

1.  Laurel Loco Express (Less PA than Stealth)

2.  Utah Stealth

3.  Utah Cobras

4.  Boise Generals

5.  Arco Anarchy

6.  Magic Valley Bulldawgs

 

AA:

1.  Uintah Basin Oilers

2.  Gallatin Valley Snow Devils

3.  Idaho Mustangs

4.  Davis Vipers

5.  Elko Warriors

6.  Idaho Lancers

 

Correction of Dixie as #1 because of SOS



-- Edited by Jess Peterson on Monday 5th of May 2014 07:49:22 AM

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 6
Date:
Permalink  
 

I know this will change over the next 4 weeks but I'm hoping we stay in the top tier. However in this scenario shouldn't the Stealth be Tier 1 #6 because they beat Stampede in April, making Stampede #1 Tier 2 and Loco Express #2 Tier 2?
-- Edited by Jake Green 9 on Monday 5th of May 2014 10:42:00 AM



-- Edited by Jake Green 9 on Monday 5th of May 2014 11:00:02 AM

__________________

"Look...guano bowls. Collect the whole set!"



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 175
Date:
Permalink  
 

I checked the notes and this is correct.

Because of the new system, some of the teams will not play each other. GMs voted that if there is a three way tie and all of the teams are NOT playing or have played each other, then the head to head would be skipped and tiebreaker would go straight to SOS. If all the teams played each other, we could go head to head but because the Loco Express do not play the Stealth, we can't just put them as the 3rd team in that scenario.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 299
Date:
Permalink  
 

SOS IS 11 - 11 FOR BOTH TEAMS. WHAT WAS THE NEXT TIEBREAKER?

__________________
Jaye Webster Utah Cobras


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 175
Date:
Permalink  
 

Here are the tiebreakers as voted on:
Win/Loss
Head to head
Strength of schedule
Points against
Division Record

If still tied we go to a coin toss.

So the next tie breaker was PA.


__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 299
Date:
Permalink  
 

loco express would be 1 seed with 78 pa to the stealth 110 pa.


__________________
Jaye Webster Utah Cobras


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 175
Date:
Permalink  
 

In the second tier, correct

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 23
Date:
Permalink  
 

Jess, is it not possible to stay with the strength of schedule tie breaker regardless of which teams played each other. This is how most other leagues work.

For instance, because the Stealth and Stampede played head to head and the Stealth won the Stealth win that tie breaker. Then, because the Locos and Stealth haven't played you bypass the head to head and move to SOS.

Obviously I'm bias here but it seems that this would be logical in determining the highest seed of the three teams and it's how all other leagues would break this tie that I've been a part of or have read up on.

Ruling it this way allows the Locos to not be penalized for not playing head to head and it still uses the tie breaker order as set previously. Otherwise, it feels like the Stealth are getting penalized for winning a game and places them inferior in ranking to a team they beat and were obviously superior to.

I think you'd agree that the goal is to put the best teams in the top tier and ruling it the way you've explained seems contrary to that logic. Obviously, none of this matters currently because there are still a bunch of games to play but I would hope that the way I've described the ruling to be done would be the way it's handled at the end of the season. At this point in the season ruling it the way I've described would obviously be in our favor but I would hope this is the way the ruling is carried out at the end of the season even if it turns out to be to our disadvantage.

You're doing a great job with this league. I'm not sure we've ever had the opportunity to meet so the next time you're reffing one of our games I'd like to do official introductions.

Thanks Jess.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 109
Date:
Permalink  
 

He was the side line judge in your last game on your side line....Lmao

__________________

Don't take it personal...I don't



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 23
Date:
Permalink  
 

Haha you're kidding. I had no idea that was Jess. Well then Jess, good to meet you brother. Haha.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 60
Date:
Permalink  
 

Actually Jess was not there. he is a back judge. although that guy looks somewhat similar to Jess



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 266
Date:
Permalink  
 

They all look alike... giant, majestic, black & white striped representations of justice, each of them possessing not one, but TWO all-seeing eyes.

__________________

Darrell Baranowski

Utah Shock #51

Player... just a player. Hallelujah, I'M ONLY A PLAYER!!



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 175
Date:
Permalink  
 

I was on the Stealth/REV game as the back judge. (25 yards away calling PI)

Really Sam? Really? You think I look somewhat similar to Eddie Munster?

And we usually don't have use of both of our eyes because our head is up our ass or at least that's what we're always told.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 60
Date:
Permalink  
 

haha no. i was just trying to alleviate some of the confusion i really don't think you look anything like that other guy, except you have the same hair color.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard